When accidents occur or when disease strikes everyone wants high quality medical care. There are many world class hospitals in every city, but the sad fact is that these facilities are restricted to those that can afford them. Only those with medical insurance or that have ample cash reserves have access to the latest treatment methods and the best doctors. Those that cannot afford such services must depend upon Calgary walk in clinics.
Facilities that are classified in this manner are not uniform. In fact, the services that they offer differ wildly. Some are managed by supermarkets, others by community health services. Many charities operate medical facilities that offer basic services and often emergency treatment too. These facilities offer their services to all and sundry. Many are free and most of the others charge a modest fee only.
A lot of people think that all these facilities offer emergency treatment. This is definitely not the case. Many do, but many others offer limited services and are not equipped to deal with trauma and emergencies. The majority of facilities do not even employ a doctor. Those without health care benefits should familiarize themselves with the free and affordable facilities in their area.
Clearly, the main benefit of these medical facilities is the fact that their services are either free or at least at a minimal fee. Patients can simply attend. No appointments are necessary and the attending staff normally treat patients on a first arrived first helped basis, but emergencies always enjoy priority, of course. Patients are accepted without having to answer potentially awkward questions on citizenship, for example.
There are drawbacks. Most of these medical facilities deal with large numbers. This means that queues can be long and waiting times can be exhausting. The attending staff does not have a lot of time for each individual patients because they have too many patients to see. Most facilities can only offer limited treatment options and sometimes patients simply cannot be helped.
Critics say that these facilities are inadequate and that they simply prove the fact that adequate health care for all is a fallacy. They also complain that very few of these facilities are equipped with the latest diagnostic tools and that they often carry only a very limited range of medication. In many cases patients are treated by staff that are not properly trained.
Private medical practitioners also often criticise these facilities. They argue that it is impossible to properly treat a patient without a full history of his health. Without such a history it is not possible to diagnose potentially serious diseases on the basis of new symptoms. They say that these clinics, at best, treat symptoms and not the underlying conditions that cause those symptoms.
Nobody will argue the fact that proper health care for all should be a national priority. At present, the poor and needy simply have to make do with what is on offer. Ideally, every citizen should be able to depend upon quality care when they need it. In the meantime, affordable and free medical facilities fulfil a very urgent need.
Facilities that are classified in this manner are not uniform. In fact, the services that they offer differ wildly. Some are managed by supermarkets, others by community health services. Many charities operate medical facilities that offer basic services and often emergency treatment too. These facilities offer their services to all and sundry. Many are free and most of the others charge a modest fee only.
A lot of people think that all these facilities offer emergency treatment. This is definitely not the case. Many do, but many others offer limited services and are not equipped to deal with trauma and emergencies. The majority of facilities do not even employ a doctor. Those without health care benefits should familiarize themselves with the free and affordable facilities in their area.
Clearly, the main benefit of these medical facilities is the fact that their services are either free or at least at a minimal fee. Patients can simply attend. No appointments are necessary and the attending staff normally treat patients on a first arrived first helped basis, but emergencies always enjoy priority, of course. Patients are accepted without having to answer potentially awkward questions on citizenship, for example.
There are drawbacks. Most of these medical facilities deal with large numbers. This means that queues can be long and waiting times can be exhausting. The attending staff does not have a lot of time for each individual patients because they have too many patients to see. Most facilities can only offer limited treatment options and sometimes patients simply cannot be helped.
Critics say that these facilities are inadequate and that they simply prove the fact that adequate health care for all is a fallacy. They also complain that very few of these facilities are equipped with the latest diagnostic tools and that they often carry only a very limited range of medication. In many cases patients are treated by staff that are not properly trained.
Private medical practitioners also often criticise these facilities. They argue that it is impossible to properly treat a patient without a full history of his health. Without such a history it is not possible to diagnose potentially serious diseases on the basis of new symptoms. They say that these clinics, at best, treat symptoms and not the underlying conditions that cause those symptoms.
Nobody will argue the fact that proper health care for all should be a national priority. At present, the poor and needy simply have to make do with what is on offer. Ideally, every citizen should be able to depend upon quality care when they need it. In the meantime, affordable and free medical facilities fulfil a very urgent need.
About the Author:
To find your nearest Calgary walk in clinics today, don't hesitate to visit the recommended website. Check out this directory now at http://health-local.com.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire